sjuk wrote:
DeFrag as a virtual universe (with concomitant maps' objects as teleporters, velocity pads, electroshaders) represents congruent planet of Solar system
The cup's site banner at 2012 was stodgy (UT guised as ZERG prefers), and preliminary 2014 year's is feebly for now. Please don't count it as meticulous remarks-hunting, little changes will adduct to a much more pleasant presentable look. So, DeFrag's distinct style should be restrained
Site's current background bubbly image (by "twitter solutions") suits to Uran character by color gradient, but not by shape
Pierce lines coming between C and 2 at banner and secant SignUp pieces are closer examples of what will fit. But again, not sairax'ed overweighted letters.
v. If a player gets a random OB that is hard or impossible to react to, for example while performing a groundboost, the demo will probably NOT be rejected. We highly suggest submitting multiple demos in any case.
Demo validators have the right to reject demos with engine/physics/map exploits not listed in these rules, if they violate the common sense of fair play. It is the responsibility of the validators to judge that. If you find a trick / bug / map exploit that you are unsure about, it is highly recommended to contact one of our validators or admins to confirm its usage.
Thanks TittenIgniton. I wish all the players were as conscious as you.TittenIgnition wrote:In a tournament as small as this, there's no point in trying to exploit "vague" terms in the rules.
khetti wrote:I disagree strongly with both the letter and the spirit of many of the rules.
The "Random OB" section prohibits many totally consistent ob methods.
Don't ask for infinite examples, just consider the intent of such a rule: valuing skill over luck.
If a player gets a random OB that is hard or impossible to react to, for example while performing a groundboost, the demo will probably NOT be rejected. We highly suggest submitting multiple demos in any case.
Demo validators have the right to reject demos with engine/physics/map exploits not listed in these rules, if they violate the common sense of fair play. It is the responsibility of the validators to judge that. If you find a trick / bug / map exploit that you are unsure about, it is highly recommended to contact one of our validators or admins to confirm its usage.
Are you going to change your imprecise definition at your convenience?
Are we supposed to continually check the rules throughout the competition in case someone told you about a trick that scares you?
© 2011 q3df.org. Designed by Zeences. All Right Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Prostylize Darkgrey style by Ishimaru Design