Board index mDd Board Rule finding board

+strafe

This stays here as long as it takes to work out the new server rules

+strafe

Postby Phoenix » Jun 13th, '10, 7:50 am

Is +strafe still legal to use for zwobs?

What about +strafe in combination with m_side 0 and m_forward x.xx

If you want to get technical it pretty much does to zwobs what +left does to strafing. However, I may be rusty but I can't think of a way to do a zwob without using +strafe. And I don't see anything wrong with tweaking the m_forward and m_side values as long as they aren't updated via scripts etc throughout the run.

Zwobs aren't super common in most runs but I thought I'd ask because +strafe and m_forward is the only thing i have ever used that might be considered cheating here. So what's the opinion on this for both runs and for freestyle.
Phoenix
 
Posts: 185
Joined: Apr 19th, '10, 5:49 am
Location: Canada

Re: +strafe

Postby $$-albion » Jun 13th, '10, 10:38 am

For as much as I know, using +strafe and m_forward values aren't forbidden if used for zwobbing :)
User avatar
$$-albion
 
Posts: 291
Joined: May 6th, '09, 9:15 pm
Location: Bruges, Belgium

Re: +strafe

Postby |PsY|blumen » Jun 14th, '10, 10:12 am

not sure, but i think zwobs cant be scripted.
User avatar
|PsY|blumen
sparkle bunny
 
Posts: 46
Joined: May 2nd, '09, 3:43 pm

Re: +strafe

Postby ally is a cheater » Jun 14th, '10, 10:22 am

aha ahah ahahahahaha
ally is a cheater
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Sep 20th, '09, 9:28 pm

Re: +strafe

Postby AL!EN » Jun 16th, '10, 11:41 am

If someone use +strafe, he must use his mouse to make move of the player. I don't see a problem when somone want to walk with 150 ups speed.
"strafe is the most important 'weapon' in defrag" - <hk>
User avatar
AL!EN
 
Posts: 282
Joined: May 2nd, '09, 8:26 am
Location: Poland

Re: +strafe

Postby oranje » Jun 17th, '10, 12:23 am

ban all binds pls

real quakers play with only their minds eh
User avatar
oranje
 
Posts: 107
Joined: Jun 1st, '10, 4:37 am

Re: +strafe

Postby Phoenix » Jun 17th, '10, 11:47 am

oranggeh wrote:ban all binds pls

real quakers play with only their minds eh


Well this is the direction things seem to be going so I thought I'd ask. It's more for using +strafe in combination with m_forward and m_side though. Not for +strafe on its own.
Phoenix
 
Posts: 185
Joined: Apr 19th, '10, 5:49 am
Location: Canada

Re: +strafe

Postby DF///Kov3nant » May 28th, '11, 9:47 am

i actually made a similar post to this a while back. <hk> told me that +strafe is perfectly fine for zwobs. it is by default bound to the alt key. so...

not sure about m_forward and m_side or whatever. never used them. have no idea what they do
User avatar
DF///Kov3nant
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Mar 11th, '11, 7:19 am
Location: Rodgau, Germany

Re: +strafe

Postby TittenIgnition » May 28th, '11, 5:41 pm

[s7p]Kov3nant wrote:i actually made a similar post to this a while back. <hk> told me that +strafe is perfectly fine for zwobs. it is by default bound to the alt key. so...

not sure about m_forward and m_side or whatever. never used them. have no idea what they do

Those are just the sensitivity of +strafe. Lower values = slower movement w/ +strafe.
wtf i have a signature?
User avatar
TittenIgnition
 
Posts: 454
Joined: Jun 4th, '10, 1:24 am
Location: QuakeNet

Re: +strafe

Postby 1000archangels » Aug 4th, '11, 11:45 am

well yeah, yawspeed and pitchspeed are *just* the sensivities of +strafe, so, you know, I can see his point I think, since dem both are forbidden :)
1000archangels
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Jun 11th, '10, 5:31 pm


cron